There’s no single ‘North Vancouver soil.’ Drill into the Capilano Highlands and you’ll hit dense glacial till with cobbles that rattle a split spoon. Move down toward the marine benches near Lower Lonsdale, and the borehole logs shift to soft, grey silts laid down when the shoreline was 100 metres higher. This contrast is exactly why a grain size analysis—run properly with both sieve stacks and a hydrometer—isn’t just a lab formality. It’s the first clue to how the ground will behave under load, how it drains, and whether it’s susceptible to liquefaction in a Cascadia event. In our North Vancouver lab, we combine ASTM D6913 for the coarse fraction and ASTM D7928 for fines, delivering a full particle-size distribution that feeds directly into bearing capacity, drainage design, and seismic classification under the NBCC. When the gradation curve straddles sand and silt, we often run parallel Atterberg limits to nail down the plasticity, and for deeper strata where the fines percentage changes with depth, a CPT log gives us a continuous profile to compare against the lab results.
A single hydrometer reading at the two-hour mark can change the liquefaction classification from susceptible to non-susceptible under NBCC 2020.
Local considerations
North Vancouver’s build-out history adds a layer of geotechnical risk that gradation data helps manage. From the 1950s through the 1980s, large tracts of the Lower Capilano and Norgate areas were developed over former swamp and intertidal flats using uncontrolled fill. Boreholes in these neighbourhoods routinely encounter 2 to 4 metres of heterogeneous sandy silt with organic lenses, underlain by natural marine clay. Without a grain size curve, a designer might assume a free-draining subgrade; with it, the 30% clay fraction tells you to expect low permeability and long consolidation times. The hydrometer data becomes critical for estimating settlement rates under fill surcharge. Another risk pattern we see repeatedly: steep creekside lots where colluvium contains a matrix of silty sand that plots in the ‘most liquefiable’ band on a Tsuchida curve. Running the full sieve-plus-hydrometer analysis on these samples gives the fines content and D50 needed for a defensible liquefaction screening per NBCC 2020, avoiding both over-conservatism and under-design.
Applicable standards
ASTM D6913/D6913M-17 – Standard Test Methods for Particle-Size Distribution (Gradation) of Soils Using Sieve Analysis, ASTM D7928-21 – Standard Test Method for Particle-Size Distribution (Gradation) of Fine-Grained Soils Using the Sedimentation (Hydrometer) Analysis, ASTM D2487-17e1 – Standard Practice for Classification of Soils for Engineering Purposes (Unified Soil Classification System), NBCC 2020 – Division B, Part 4 – Seismic Design provisions referencing liquefaction susceptibility criteria, CSA A23.3-19 – Design of Concrete Structures (aggregate gradation requirements)